I'm really glad that societies are thinking about these issues. But I often feel the proposals are underwhelming, given that we could be in this situation for more than a year.
Here's an analogy. In America, we tend to try to make sure that major snowstorms inconvenience us as little as possible. Cities are expected to get the snow cleared immediately. When I lived in Irkutsk, people just accepted that life in the winter was fundamentally different from life in the summer. In the summer, people worked *hard*. In the winter, they didn't necessarily work that much. Because you really couldn't.
I'm not saying we should stop working. But I think that trying to plow forwards and do what we always do as closely as possible is maybe not the right way to go about this. This article gets at this a little:
"While it's frustrating not to be able to do data collection, this is a great chance to work on a paper, take an online course, build that skill you were always saying you were going to do," says Teachman. "It's also a good time to write grant proposals."
But I kinda feel like we should be much more bold in our planning and advice.
------------------------------
Josh Hartshorne
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 03-23-2020 15:36
From: Carol Bradfield
Subject: APA resource for conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic
------------------------------
Carol Bradfield
Society for Research in Child Development
Washington, DC
cbradfield@srcd.org
------------------------------